COPY 3.0 State St., Boaton, Mass. May 21, 3.035. Hon. Hubert York, Seely of the Interior, Washington, D. C. Dons Mr. Searetary: Your Letter of May 18, 1935, received. I am sorry to have annaad this trouble but it is the outgomo of the adorsay maintained for so long in the Park office. The blueprint you gave 100 a year are aaya up in the right hand corner Lafayatte National Park--Plan of Proposed Motor Roads and Traile, 1932°, On this map are many green lines like marked in yellon the present carriage road I am discussing, within these green lines. There WORD the limits of the Park which Mr. Your of the National Parks Aoa'a was allowed to print in 1924 on paga 8 of his pemphlet entitled #An Analysis of Lafayatte National Park", and ount all over the United States. If those limits were not the correct ones why, Mr. Secretary, 7070 the public who seed theee pamphlots allowed to ba misland on these satters? As the now BAD you had made last current 3016 the above mentioned reed out of consideration it was a natural supposition this this road WILD not to be built. The above londs mo to not the following questions: 1.) What is the status, than, of the other roads lost off the original map? 3.) Do they come undor cho same category as this one of belong- ing to the Trustees of Public Reservations? 3.) Is it not true that property under the control of the True- Caos will eventually GONG into the Park? (The old blue- print and Mr. Yord's pamphlet would show that they did: a Truetoo told mo this was the final resting place of land hell by the Trustoon.) It asams to mo, therefore, Mr. Secretary, that from what I'hoard at the hearing in Washington lost year, and from what I gather in studying the ins and outs of this problom I cannot help feeling that the Government 10 indirectly responsible. I want very much to ho a booster for the Lafayette National Park as I am for the Western Parks but GO fax I 000 very little chance of my boooming one at presont. Sincerely yours,