From collection Creating Acadia National Park: The George B. Dorr Research Archive of Ronald H. Epp

Page 1

Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Page 5

Page 6

Page 7

Page 8

Page 9

Page 10
Search
results in pages
Metadata
Myers, Frederic 1843-1901
10bl-Eb81
map
ISS: Biography of Frederic Myers
Page 1 of 5
SurvivalAfterDeath.org
News and articles on Mediumship, Psi and Survival every week
Researchers
Homepage
About Us
Frederic Myers
Latest News & Events
1843-1901
Biographies
Articles
A LEADING mind in psychical research)founder of a
Experiments
cosmic philosophy which may yet revolutionise scientific
thought, a profound scholar, a poet of distinction and a brilliant
Photographs
psychologist. For thirty years he filled the post of an inspector
Theory
of schools at Cambridge. Here his resolve to pursue psychical
investigation was born in 1869 after a starlight walk and talk
Online Library
with Henry Sidgwick.
Links
His starting point was that if a spiritual world ever manifested to
Recommended Books
man, it must manifest now, and that, in consequence, a serious
Contact and Feedback
investigation must end by discovering some unmistakable
signs of it. For "if all attempts to verify scientifically the
Search
intervention of another world should be definitely proved futile,
this would be a terrible blow, a mortal blow, to all our hopes of
another life, as well as of traditional religion" for "it would
thenceforth be very difficult for men to be persuaded, in our
age of clear thinking, that what is now found to be illusion and
trickery was in the past thought to be truth and revelation."
He had in mind the same methods of deliberate, dispassionate
and exact inquiry which built up our actual knowledge of the
visible world. It was in this spirit that the SPR of which he was a
fellow-founder came to be established in 1882. He devoted all
his energies to its work and concentrated with a deep grasp of
science on the psychological side. Of the sixteen volumes of
Proceedings published while he lived there is not one without
an important contribution from his pen. In Phantasms of the
Living the system of classification was entirely his idea. The
words telepathy, supernormal and veridical and many others
less in use were coined by him. He played a large part in
organising the International Congress of Psychology and acted
as secretary to the one held in London in 1892. In the SPR he
filled the post of honorary secretary. In 1900 he was elected to
the presidential chair, a post which only distinguished scientists
had filled before. To periodicals such as the Fortnightly Review,
the Nineteenth Century, he contributed many articles. They
were collected and published, in 1893, under the title Science
and a Future Life, and Other Essays.
His chef d'oeuvre, Human Personality and its Survival of Bodily
Death, was posthumously published. The University of Madras
adopted it as a text book for its courses on lectures on
psychology at the faculty of philosophy and letters. It is an
exposition of the potential powers of the subliminal self which
he pictured as the real ego, a vast psychic organism of which
the ordinary consciousness is but an accidental fraction, the life
http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/researchers/myers.htm
8/29/2007
ISS: Biography of Frederic Myers
Page 2 of 5
of the soul, not bound up with the life of the body, of which the
so-called supernormal faculties are the ordinary channels of
perception. It is a theory of tremendous implications. It is an
attack on the spiritualist position that all, or most, of the
supernormal phenomena were due to the spirits of the dead.
Myers contended that by far the largest proportion was due to
the action of the still embodied spirit of the agent or of the
percipient himself. The theory has brought order into a chaotic
mass of psychical phenomena. On the other hand, it greatly
enhanced the probability of survival. As the powers which he
claimed for the subliminal self did not degenerate during the
course of evolution and serve no purpose in this life they are
obviously destined for a future existence. Why, for instance,
should the subconscious SO carefully preserve all thoughts and
memories if there will be no use for them? William James
suggested that the problems of the subliminal mind should be
called "the problem of Myers." "Whatever the judgment of the
future may be on Mr. Myers' speculation", he said, "the credit
will always remain to them of being the first attempt in any
language to consider the phenomena of hallucination,
automatism, double personality, and mediumship as
connected parts of one whole subject."
"If future discoveries confirm his thesis of the intervention of
the discarnate, in the web and the woof of our mental and
physical world," writes Theodore Flournoy, "then his name will
be inscribed in the golden book of the initiated, and, joined to
those of Copernicus and Darwin, he will complete the triad of
geniuses who have the most profoundly revolutionised
scientific thought, in the order, Cosmological, Biological and
Psychological."
The same author, a profound psychologist himself, considered
Myers "one of the most remarkable personalities of our time in
the realm of mental science." Dr. Leaf compares him to Ruskin
and considers him in some respects his peer. According to
Charles Richet "if Myers were not a mystic, he had all the faith
of a mystic and the ardour of an apostle, in conjunction with
the sagacity and precision of a savant."
"I never knew a man so hopeful concerning his ultimate
destiny," writes Oliver Lodge in memoriam. "He once asked
me whether I would barter - if it were possible - my unknown
destiny, whatever it might be, for as many aeons of
unmitigated and wise terrestrial happiness as might last till the
secular fading of the sun, and then an end. He would not."
He was so convinced of survival that his friends often heard
him say, "I am counting the days until the holidays."
In Human Personality physical phenomena receive but little
consideration. Myers believes in the occurrence of telekinetic
phenomena but in spite of the experiments of William Crookes
and his own, their genuine occurrence, from the viewpoint of
the public, did not appear to him sufficiently believable to
justify their discussion in his book. Nevertheless, in dealing
with possession he suggested an ingenious explanation, i.e.,
that the possessing spirit may use the organism more skilfully
http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/researchers/myers.htm
8/29/2007
ISS: Biography of Frederic Myers
Page 3 of 5
than its owner and may emit some energy which can visibly
move ponderable objects not actually in contact with the flesh.
Of his own investigations between 1872-76 he said that they
were "tiresome and distasteful enough.'
On May 9, 1874, in the company of Edmund Gurney, he made
the acquaintance of Stainton Moses. The acquaintance led to
friendship. When Moses died on September 5, 1892, his
notebooks were handed to Myers for study. His articles in
Proceedings, SPR, Vol. IX and Vol. XI contain the best
accounts of this remarkable mediumship, but his conclusions
were not based on personal experiences with Moses. When he
had some startling ones with Miss Wood and Miss Fairlamb in
1878 he kept strangely silent. Alfred Russel Wallace seen his
notes on the séances held under the auspices of the SPR with
the two mediums at Cambridge in Henry Sidgwick's rooms.
They state that the medium's wrists were securely tied with
tapes and the ends were tacked down to the floor and sealed.
Many forms came out of the cabinet, both adults and children.
The seals were found untampered. The colour of the tape and
the scaling wax was varied at each séance, the medium was
put into a hammock which was connected with pulleys to a
weighing machine, nevertheless the phenomena occurred as
before without the least suspicious cause.
In 1894 on the lle Roubaud he was the guest of Charles Richet
and participated with Oliver Lodge and Julien Ochorowitz in
the experiments conducted with Eusapia Palladino. He could
not refrain from expressing an opinion and admitted that the
phenomena were genuine. The Cambridge exposure shook
his belief and he wrote:
"I had no doubt that systematic trickery had been
used from the first to last, and that there was no
adequate ground for attributing any of the
phenomena occurring at these sittings to a
supernormal cause."
Later, however, he participated in another series of sittings
with Eusapia in Paris and at the solemn adjuration of Richet he
declared himself convinced that both telekinesis and
ectoplasm are genuine phenomena. He sat with Mrs. Everitt,
Mme. d'Esperance, and David Duguid, he had the strange
experience of seeing objective pictures in a crystal ball and he
investigated the haunted Ballechin House in Perthshire,
Scotland. As a result he published two papers in Proceedings:
"On Alleged Movements of Objects without Contact, occurring
not in the Presence of a Paid Medium" (Vol VII, Parts XIX-XX.,
1891-92). Still, he was not enthusiastic for physical
phenomena. It was owing to his discouragement that Mrs.
Thompson ceased to sit for physical demonstrations and
developed chiefly as a trance medium for the SPR. He had his
reward. The communication received through Mrs. Thompson
finally confirmed his belief in survival. Before the International
Psychological Congress in 1900 he read a paper on his
experiences.
http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/researchers/myers.htm
8/29/2007
ISS: Biography of Frederic Myers
Page 4 of 5
Attention to some remarkable omissions in Myers' great work
was called by James Robertson in an address printed in Light,
May 30, 1903. He objects that Andrew Jackson Davis is
passed by a single remark and says that "a clear, unbiased
examination of the life and writings of this extraordinary man
would have given him more than all he has gathered together
in these long drawn out statements as to disintegration of
personality, hypnotism, trance, possession, etc."
After Myers' death a flood of communications was put down to
his spirit by many mediums. The most important ones were
those received through Mrs. Piper, Mrs. Verrall and Mrs.
Holland. As regards the latter, Frank Podmore and Miss Alice
Johnson agree that the Myers control is a subconscious
creation of the medium. The views there expressed are alien
to the mentality of the living Myers. Mrs. Verrall obtained the
contents of a sealed letter which Myers had written in 1891
and left in the care of Oliver Lodge for such a test. However,
when the letter was opened in 1904 the contents were found to
be entirely different. In 1907, Eleanor Sidgwick obtained good
identity proofs through Mrs. Piper. On her behalf Mrs. Verrall
asked some questions to which she did not know the answer
and received correct replies as regards the contents of the last
conversation that had taken place between Mrs. Sidgwick and
Myers. Many other impressive indications of his surviving self
were found in cross-correspondences, especially during Mrs.
Piper's second visit to Britain in 1906-07. The whole system of
cross-correspondences appears to have been elaborated by
him and the wealth of classical knowledge displayed in the
connected fragments, given by several mediums, raises a
strong presumption that they have emanated from Myers'
mind. The most striking evidence of this nature was obtained
after Mrs. Piper's return to America by Mr. G. B. Dorr in 1908.
Podmore considers it "perhaps the strongest evidence yet
obtained for the identity of any communicator." In The Road to
Immortality which was automatically produced by Geraldine
Cummins a stupendous vista is opened up by F. W. H. Myers
of the soul's progression through the after-death states. As
regards the authorship of the book, Oliver Lodge received
independent testimony through Mrs. Leonard from Myers of his
communications through Miss Cummins. Oliver Lodge sees no
reason to dissent from the view that the remarkable accounts
of the fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh state "are the kind of
ideas which F. W. H. Myers may by this time (1932) have been
able to form."
Source (with minor modifications): An Encyclopaedia of Psychic Science by Nandor
Fodor (1934).
Articles by Frederic Myers on this website:
Science and a Future Life
Introduction to "Human Personality"
Phantasms of the Dead
Motor Automatism
Trance, Possession and Ecstasy
http://www.survivalafterdeath.org/researchers/myers.htm
8/29/2007
Frederic Myers - Proof of Life After Death
Page 1 of 5
Home
Products
Affiliations
Facilities
Free Materials
Partner Site
Frederic Myers - Proof of Life After
Death
Personal development has, as one of its aims, to transcend the human
condition. If consciousness is limited to one's current lifetime, and if one's
only route to immortality is to reproduce one's genes and to try to make one's
mark on the world for the benefit of future generations, then still these are
worthwhile aims.
But if, instead, one's consciousness survives death, then the motivation to
transcend the human condition becomes far stronger. One's personal
development in this lifetime will affect one's situation in the after-life, and it
will determine one's future - whether it be to reincarnate in this world (in a
worse, similar or better condition than one is now) or to fulfill one's potential
by moving on to higher purposes and responsibilities.
Frederick Myers recognized this as a critical question for all intelligent
people and worked relentlessly to provide us with a solid proof of life after
death.
1. Frederic Myers
Frederick Myers was a professor of classics at Cambridge University in England. He was
born in 1843 and he died in 1901. One overriding interest characterized this man: a
passionate curiosity about the meaning of human life. He devoted most of his adult years
to trying to satisfy this curiosity, but he did it in a rather unusual way. He did not pore
over theological writings and philosophical speculation. He felt that if human life did have
a purpose, then it could be discovered in only one way: through the study of human
http://www.trans4mind.com/spiritual/myers1.htm
9/5/2003
Frederic Myers - Proof of Life After Death
Page 2 of 5
experiences. This conviction led him, in 1882, to found the first Society for Psychical
Research with some of his Cambridge colleagues.
In particular, Myers and his associates wanted to know if human beings survived bodily
death. If they did, then life in a body must have a discoverable purpose. Myers was a man
of enormous energy and great intellectual ability. After twenty years of intensive
investigation, he concluded that he had answered this question. He wrote a book about
what he had learned that became a classic - probably the most important work ever
written in this strange field, though now out of print - called 'Human Personality and Its
Survival of Bodily Death." [To obtain the out-of-print works by Frederic Myers call John
Gach Books on (800) 465-9023 or email: inquiry@gach.com].
Myers had a strong interest in mediumship, and grappled to the end of his life with the
problems involved in interpreting its results. The difficulties lay not with the limitations of
the mediums' powers, but with their scope. When a medium became entranced, and a
voice, remarkably like that of a dead person, issued forth from her mouth, claiming to be
that person and showing an encyclopedic knowledge of that person's life, then it seemed
to Myers that contact was being made with the dead. Or when a medium, in a half-trance,
seemed to be talking to someone who had been in his grave for some time, and was able
to answer detailed questions about his life, Myers at first reached the conclusion that the
dead still live.
But his research, in the end, didn't turn out to be quite that simple. For he became aware
of cases in which those attending a seance had been given such detail about a person they
knew who claimed in the communication to be dead. Later, however, they would discover
that he was still alive! And in a few cases, as an experiment, someone had gone to a
medium and mentally concentrated on an entirely fictitious personality, only to receive
'communications' from that 'personality,' claiming to come from beyond the grave! In
other words, when mediums went into trance states, they could at times pick up accurate
information about living or fictitious persons telepathically and deliver it as if it came from
the dead. In other words, the medium may be unable to distinguish between telepathic
communication from the living and telepathic communication from the dead.
So this posed a problem. Mediums did not seem to do such things in a fraudulent spirit;
they were sometimes unable to tell whether information came from the living or from the
dead, but tended to make the sometimes false assumption it was from the latter. Myers
never solved this problem during his life. What he did was even more impressive. He
solved it after he was dead!
2. The Cross-Correspondences
Within a few weeks of Myers's death in 1901, some very strange communications began
to be received by psychics in England, the United States and India. They came through
automatic writing to a total of a dozen psychics and continued for a period of thirty years
and then later by his fellow leaders of the Society for Psychical Research, Professor Henry
Sidgwick and Edmund Gurney as they too died. What was strangest about them was that
they made no sense. Or perhaps they did - for they were SO mysteriously worded that it
http://www.trans4mind.com/spiritual/myers1.html
9/5/2003
Frederic Myers - Proof of Life After Death
Page 3 of 5
almost seemed their meaning was being deliberately concealed. And most of them were
signed, "Myers." In all more than three thousand scripts were transmitted over thirty
years. Some of them were more than forty typed pages long.
But although the text of the messages seemed indecipherable, the 'instructions' which
often accompanied them were clear. These instructions repeated a number of themes. The
'script' should be sent to a particular person, who would turn out to be one of the other
psychics involved. Or it should be sent to the Society for Psychical Research. And that
although its content may seem to be senseless, it was in reality anything but: it was an
attempt by the deseased communicator to prove his continued existence. These
instructions and explanations were, in fact, frequent and explicit. "Record the bits," wrote
Myers, "and when fitted they will make the whole." And again, "I will give the words
between you that neither alone can read but together they will give the clue."
It was some time, however, before the people involved fully realized what was happening.
When they did, they gathered the fragments together and found that they had
communications which were clear, coherent and continuous. Most of these scripts
consisted of references to and quotations from both classical and modern literature. Some
were SO obscure that only a scolar, and a specialized one at that, would recognize them.
The intention was to make these scripts seem random and pointless to the individual
psychics, in order to avoid giving clues to the train of thought behind them. They would
only become meaningful and show evidence of design when pieced together by an
independent investigator. The interest lies in the question: Who selected them to convey a
train a thought which could not be deduced from any one person's script? The answer was
the dead communicator.
Myers was trying to prove that the mind of the medium could not be the creator of the
message: how could it be when the message was only a fragment which made no sense
unless linked with other, equally 'meaningless' fragments. Myers was quite explicit about
what he was doing. He was causing a dozen psychics, in various widely separated parts of
the world, not only to refer to the same topic - often a highly obscure one - but to do SO
in ways which were complementary. Like the parts of a jigsaw puzzle, these 'pieces' did
more than refer to the same theme; they did SO in ways which were intricately intertwined.
Those who studied and tried to interpret these 'jigsaw puzzles' called them cross-
correspondences.
The simplest case involved the repetition of particular themes drawn from various
language and literary sources. On April 24, 1907, while in trance in the United States, an
American medium named Mrs Piper three times uttered the word "Thantos," a Greek
word meaning 'death,' despite the fact that she had no knowledge of Greek. Such
repetitions were often a signal that cross-correspondences were about to begin. But it had
begun already. About a week earlier, in India, Mrs Holland had done some automatic
writing, and in that script the following enigmatic communication had appeared: "Mors
[Latin for death]. And with that the shadow of death fell upon his limbs." On April 29th,
in England, Mrs Verrall, writing automatically, produced the words: "Warmed both hands
before the fire of life. It fades and I am ready to depart." This is a quotation from a poem
by nineteenth-century English poet, Walter Landor. Mrs Verrall next drew a triangle. This
could be Delta, the fourth letter of the Greek alphabet. She had always considered it a
symbol of death. She then wrote: "Manibus date lilia plenis" [give lilies with full hands].
http://www.trans4mind.com/spiritual/myers1.htm
9/5/2003
Frederic Myers - Proof of Life After Death
Page 4 of 5
This is a quotation from Virgil's Aeneid in which an early death is foretold. This was
followed by the statement: "Come away, come away, Pallida mors [Latin for pale death],"
and, finally, an explicit statement from the communicator: "You have got the word plainly
written all along in your writing. Look back." The 'word,' or 'theme,' was quite obvious
when these fragments, given in the same month to three mediums thousands of miles
apart, were put together and scrutinized. And in view of the lifelong interest of the
communicator, it was certainly an appropriate theme. Death.
This gives some indication of the complexity of even the simplest cross-correspondence.
And most of those who have studied them have concluded that they were exactly what
they claimed to be: an experiment conducted from beyond the grave to establish that
Myers still lived.
Myers pursued this task with a diligence characteristic of him in life. From 1901 to 1932,
more than three thousand scripts were communicated. Receiving and interpreting such a
vast body of material was often burdensome to those involved. But for Myers, the whole
enterprise was a source of anguish. He had survived physical death, as others do, and now
he was desperately eager to communicate this fact in a fashion which would convince his
still living colleagues. But, because he had no body, he had to use the minds of others. He
had to struggle to 'get through. And in the scripts he sent, he refers again and again to the
suffering that this cost him.
"Oh, if I could only leave you the proofthat I continue. Yet another attempt
to run the blockade - to strive to get a message through. How can I make
your hand docile enough - how can I convince them? I am trying, amid
unspeakable difficulties. It is impossible for me to know how much of what I
send reaches you. I feel as if I had presented my credentials - reiterated the
proofs of my identity in a wearisomely repetitive manner. The nearest simile I
can find to express the difficulty of sending a message is that I appear to be
standing behind a sheet of frosted glass, which blurs sight and deadens
sound, dicatating feebly to a reluctant and somewhat obtuse secretary. A
feeling of terrible impotence burdens me. Oh it is a dark road."
Myers, for all the grand scope of his interests, was a very modest man. And he was also a
very systematic one. These two qualities perfectly explained the style and timing of his
after-death communications. He had first to prove to his friends that he still lived and he
devoted thirty years to that. But what was of even greater interest, once that was
established, was his description of what it was like to be dead. Myers, always the scholar,
was not about to run hastily into a discussion about such a momentous subject. He was
very systematic and cautious about that too. He had been dead for nearly twenty-three
years before, at last, he started to communicate on that most mysterious of all
geographies - the world of the dead.
Myers was not, of course, the first to describe life after death. Plenty of other
communicators had done that in spiritualist seances, but although their reports had at first
been examined with fascinated anticipation, thay were soon dismissed with snorts of
derision. For Heaven, the afterlife, had always been something very special to man - a
transcendent paradise where the pain and struggle of this life would be surmounted and
the mysteries of human life and death would at last be revealed in the very abode of God
http://www.trans4mind.com/spiritual/myers1.htm
9/5/2003
Frederic Myers - Proof of Life After Death
Page 5 of 5
himself. But what was reported was quite something else indeed. For what the
communicators described was nothing but an earth-life. It was terribly beautiful, and the
'dead' were very happy, and active too. What exactly did they do there? Well, pretty much
what they had always done - they played golf, for example, and drank Scotch. They had
sexual adventures and they smoked cigars. They played cards, lived in houses like those
they had occupied on earth, and even went to work! Now this, obviously, could not be
Heaven: it was clearly spiritualist self-delusion. Myers, however, was to show that these
communicators were right - at least in part. For it had never occurred to the critics that if
men were going to transcend their earth-lives after death and move onwards to a 'divine'
realm, then it would certainly be a kindness to them them to start them off with something
familiar - to match the lives and beliefs they were familiar with on earth.
Continue to Page 2
Meta-Programming
TOOLS FOR TRANSFORMATION
http://www.trans4mind.com/spiritual/myers1.html
9/5/2003
Viewer Controls
Toggle Page Navigator
P
Toggle Hotspots
H
Toggle Readerview
V
Toggle Search Bar
S
Toggle Viewer Info
I
Toggle Metadata
M
Zoom-In
+
Zoom-Out
-
Re-Center Document
Previous Page
←
Next Page
→
Myers, Frederic 1843-1901
Details
Series 2